# Tunneler issue? **URL:** \ **Category:** Ziti Overlay\ **Created:** [July 25, 2025, 5:49am UTC](https://openziti.discourse.group/t/tunneler-issue/4901 "2025-07-25T05:49:45Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 13
**Author:** ![smilindave26](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/openziti.discourse.group/smilindave26/32/185_2.png) [@smilindave26](https://openziti.discourse.group/u/smilindave26)\ **Post date:** [July 29, 2025, 4:08pm UTC](https://openziti.discourse.group/t/tunneler-issue/4901/13 "2025-07-29T16:08:18Z")
> [@Eric](#): > > In the scenario I described, if I have to create rules for each server, knowing that each identity is a client and a server, it will be extremely difficult to manage. Hi Eric - this is the exact use case Addressable Terminators targets. You can find some good discussions and examples here on Discourse, e.g., [How to bind each entry of host.v2 to an edge router? - #6 by TheLumberjack](https://openziti.discourse.group/t/how-to-bind-each-entry-of-host-v2-to-an-edge-router/3293/6) or [Binding a service to multiple hosts - #3 by scareything](https://openziti.discourse.group/t/binding-a-service-to-multiple-hosts/1053/3) --- _[View the full topic](https://openziti.discourse.group/t/tunneler-issue/4901)._